AIs Hacking the Law

In both a 2021 essay and my 2022 book, A Hacker’s Mind, I talk about AIs finding vulnerabilities and exploits—hacking—the legal system.

Here’s some demonstrations of this from Germany:

Legal systems encode the foundations of social order in natural language. Similar to computer systems, the written law can contain vulnerabilities that invite exploitation.1 Courts absorb most exploits through interpretation, and such vulnerabilities rarely surface in the first place. With highly capable AI systems enabling the discovery of vulnerabilities at unprecedented scale, we believe the latter could change.

In testing this hypothesis, we have identified a substantial number of vulnerabilities in the German legal system using LLMs. To our knowledge, none of these have been previously recorded. We share a selection of vulnerabilities below, and present potential exploits for each. We share only those vulnerabilities whose exploitation we believe would not cause serious harm.

We believe that with cheap legal reasoning proliferating, AI systems could jeopardize the functioning of today’s legal systems. In such a world, lawmakers would need to significantly harden the process of legislation, for example by leveraging advanced AI themselves.

Still in its early stages, but definitely something that’s coming.

Posted on November 3, 2026 at 7:01 AM • 4 Comments

Comments

Rontea • November 3, 2026 8:44 AM

I wonder if our society, worshipping procedure with the zeal of a monk and the memory of a bureaucrat, can endure the laughter of logic when the letter devours the spirit.

Big Bad Duck • November 3, 2026 8:54 AM

Yo!

The obvious resolution is to decide with the “spirit of the law” and that will make jurisprudence once resolved.
I guess it’s not that typical for Anglo-Saxon law, but it was for French law… Before the UE overrode everything.

It’s litteraly why we need highly educated real people in those jobs (in addition to manage everyone emotions).

Ciao!

Bolt • November 3, 2026 9:19 AM

Shouldn’t civil law systems (like Germany’s) be pretty much immune to this?

If a lawyer tries that kind language maneuvering, the judge can simply say “that’s against the spirit of the law, if you keep pursuing this avenue of legal trickery, I’ll charge you with contempt”.

I’ve heard a judge in my country tell a plaintiff and his lawyer something to the effect of “this is not America, that kind of bs doesn’t fly here”.

Bcs • November 3, 2026 9:43 AM

I suspect we will quickly see a number of judges find something along the lines of “that is blatantly so far beyond the intent of the law as to be unsupportable”.

Given we are already having debates about what the US constitution meant to its authors that’s going to be nothing new, but it is going to feed the literalist vs originalist debate.

Leave a comment

Blog moderation policy

Login

Allowed HTML <a href="URL"> • <em> <cite> <i> • <strong> <b> • <sub> <sup> • <ul> <ol> <li> • <blockquote> <pre> Markdown Extra syntax via https://michelf.ca/projects/php-markdown/extra/

Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.